Sunday, November 3, 2013

Phasing Out the Demo

I’m struggling to make peace with phasing out class demonstrations.  I am in the middle of the transition from a traditional classroom into a student-centered learning environment.  This summer at ChemEd13 I realized that the quest for the perfect chemistry demo is outdated pedagogy that pays homage to the “Sage on the Stage” model of teaching.  As I wrote in my first blog post, Dr. Shakhashiri opened my eyes to the wonderful world of chemistry demonstrations.  Actually, adding class demonstrations to my lessons literally saved my teaching career in my second year.  I dedicated the first year of this blog to documenting how I was implementing new class demos.  Researching demos and learning new chemistry was very exciting for me as I wrote my first series of blog posts.  Yet, now I feel frustrated by the class demo because my students are passively watching me “do science” for them.

Last week I spent a class period doing a series of demos as part of my chemical reactions unit.  After a week in which my kids explored chemical reactions in the lab, I  followed up with some “more exciting” reactions as a way of reviewing their understanding of predicting products and writing chemical equations.  (This is the unit that I presented atChemEd13 in Waterloo this summer.  My fellow chemistry teachers were excited by the lesson.)  The class was going along as planned, my students were sitting around a central lab table, white boards and markers in hand.  After every demo I performed, they wrote out the chemical reaction to describe what they saw.  The eye-opening moment for me was the big finale during my B-block class.  I decided to end the day with my “thermite two ways” demo.  I took the class outside to watch the famous thermite reaction.  There were plenty of oohhs andaahhhs at the awesome power of the thermite, the sparks flying, and the dripping molten iron.  Then, I got out my rusty cannonballs (one wrapped in aluminum foil) and showed them “hand held” thermite.  Banging the two cannonballs together produces a loud pop and sparks.  After I got a good pop and some sparks, I passed the cannonballs to a student.  That’s when the magic happened.   My students got so energized by watching their classmates create the hand-held thermite reaction.  Each successful bang was greeted with cheers and applause.  One boy was crowned thethermite master; he forced some amazing blasts out of those two cannonballs.  I walked away from this day smiling at the great enthusiasm the kids had during class.  But, later that day, as I started reflecting on the lesson, it hit me like a ton of bricks; it only got exciting when the chemistry was in the students hands.  I was reminded once again that learning happens when the students engage in the process.


The flipped classroom has changed everything for me.  When I moved myself from the center of the stage, my goal shifted away from teaching the perfect lesson, and toward creating an engaging learning environment.  I realized that kids don’t learn by watching me blow up things and light stuff on fire.  Yes, I know it’s really fun for everyone, especially me, to do a big “tada” demo.  I am the first to admit that I love demos.  Yet, when I put learning as the central objective in my class, rather than performing, the outcome is unpredictable, rich, and sometimes magical.

1 comment:

  1. Thanks for sharing your experiences. It also makes me think and I've been struggling with the idea of "flipped" classroom. I would not dismiss the demonstrations completely as learning also involves seeing someone else with greater experience. Listening and seeing can still be engaging. The demos are like the seed that inspires the kids to try for themselves.

    ReplyDelete